I feel I am as an important cog in the engine room of a student’s uni life-cycle as a lecturer on any of their modules. Learning Services is an integral part of the student journey so it is important that the support staff are able to be measured not only against their peers, but to professional standards. We are aligning ourselves with the professional standards taken from the UK Professional Standards Framework (UK PSF) from the Higher Education Academy. It is also important that we run comparable workshops across the three teams within Learning Services, Librarian, Academic Skills and Technology.
To support this, I have this week been sitting in and peer observing my colleagues, this has been very beneficial. To see how they run their session, pick up tips and to share my thoughts and ideas.
The UK PSF states our workshops should:
- Respect individual learners and diverse learning communities.
- Promote participation in higher education and equality of opportunities for learners.
- Use evidence-informed approaches and the outcomes from research, scholarship and continuing professional development.
- Acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates recognising the implications for professional practice.
The workshop itself, to me, ran very smoothly. I had nine attendees which was more than booked onto the session. This was actually a good thing, there is one part to the workshop where the attendees are asked to create a mock-up poster in small groups. As it turned out, the attendees were mainly from two subject areas, both had poster assessments due.
This session is aimed at good design practice rather than the actual how to off using a computer application to create the poster. Before the session I was concerned that the attendees maybe expecting to be shown how to use an application to create their posters.
My mind was settled when at the start of the workshop I asked around the room, what their expectations were, I was pleased when the answers came back that fitted with my plan. One of the concerns I have it that sometimes I feel I may rush my way through the start of a session, speaking to fast. It is only when I look at the time and think I seem to be halfway through the session and I’ve only been going ten minutes.
This workshop lesson plan does help with that worry, the plan has built into it, points where I ask the attendees for their thoughts. This did help me keep a better, more natural pace and I feel the session flowed very well, so much so, that the timings were spot on.
A new feature that was added to this workshop was at the end, before signposting the attendees to further support models, was to ask for their feedback. I handed out a post-it note to each attendee and asked them to write on one side, one thing they have taken from the session. On the other side, to write one thing they felt they still needed to know.
This turned out to be a very useful exercise, having looked at the post-in notes subsequently, the session has met its intended learning outcomes. The theme of the comments regarding what the attendees have taken from the session was that they now understood the structure of an academic poster and how they should be laid out.
The theme of the opposite side of the post-it note was mainly around the use of technologies to enhance the posters. Towards the end of the session I showed how technology can be used, this included a brief mention of QR Codes, but concentrated on augmented reality. This showed how digital multimedia material can be ‘embedded’ onto static printed posters.
I will offer a further session to attendees that would like to incorporate this technology into their assessments.
Overall, I really enjoyed the workshop, the flow seemed to fit the timings and overall the attendees took something from it. Below you will find the slides I used for the presentation:

